Recommended TBO's

Anything having to do with an engine that powers any Aeronca aircraft
Post Reply
jkvincent
Posts: 476
Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 22:34
Location: Houston, Tx
Contact:

Recommended TBO's

Post by jkvincent »

...could someone tell me the recommended TBO for the C-65, C-85 & C-90 ? thanks in advance, Jim
Paul Agaliotis
Posts: 2589
Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2004 18:49
Location: San Martin, California
Contact:

Post by Paul Agaliotis »

The TBO is 1800hrs or 12 years. This can be found in SIL98-9A.
Paul
Mailing Adress : Paul Agaliotis 2060 E. San Martin, San Martin,Calif. 95046
Ron Babos
Posts: 571
Joined: Thu Nov 18, 2004 16:23
Location: Woodstock, Ont, Can
Contact:

tbo

Post by Ron Babos »

Paul: Do you have an(on condition) in the states? For example an o320 has a tbo of 2000 hours, but if oil pressure is good with no metal in the filter and all compressions are in spec, I believe legally you can go up to 20% more. Something like that anyway. I was also told that recommeded tbo is rated at 50%, at least on the 0-320. That's the bottom end of course as no cylinder will go that long. Our club 172 has had all four cyls change at one time or other prior to 2000 hours.
Ron
Before you believe anything I say, check with two more people. If they agree, I must be right.
Paul Agaliotis
Posts: 2589
Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2004 18:49
Location: San Martin, California
Contact:

Post by Paul Agaliotis »

Ron,
If the engine is used in a FAR Part 91 operation than the TBO is only a recommendation. If it is used in Part 121 or Part 135 operation (for hire) the TBO must be followed.
Paul
Mailing Adress : Paul Agaliotis 2060 E. San Martin, San Martin,Calif. 95046
User avatar
joea
Site Admin
Posts: 5993
Joined: Thu Nov 11, 2004 13:01
Location: Phoenix Arizona
Contact:

Post by joea »

Paul,

You bring up a good point. Continental wants us to overhaul the engine at 12 years, no matter what condition its in. Personally since mine is used for part 91 flying I am going to fly it until the engine needs some care.

We all know that this 12 year requirement is written by lawyers and has nothing to do with airworthyness...
Paul Agaliotis
Posts: 2589
Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2004 18:49
Location: San Martin, California
Contact:

Post by Paul Agaliotis »

Joe,
The Service Letter talks about environmental wear, what ever that is. I think if the rubber goes bad change the rubber.
Most of the planes fly about 50hrs a year. So every 600hrs (12yrs) they suggest an overhaul. Pretty good marketing.
Paul
Mailing Adress : Paul Agaliotis 2060 E. San Martin, San Martin,Calif. 95046
Lowell Sterchi
Posts: 23
Joined: Fri Nov 19, 2004 21:01
Contact:

ENGINE TBO's

Post by Lowell Sterchi »

I was in a flying club back in the late 60's, flying 150's (3) and a 172 with
the 0-320-E2D Engine. The 150's were flying 70 to 110hrs per Month and the 172 approx 90 to 120 per Mo. In the 14 years I was involved the rod
bearings on the 0-200 were gone at 2200 to 2300hrs. Some mechanics pulled and replaced the rod bearings at a top OH. Main bearings were still good. The 0-320 we pulled for OH at 3200 to 3600 hrs, it had a full flow oil
filter, and was still good inside. We did Overhaul the engines back to NEW
SPECTS to get these times. The banner towing Cubs with the same engine
were getting 4000 hrs on the lower end. This was the days of 80 oct. fuel.
We used Aero Shell W100, with oil change on the 0-200 at 50hrs and 100hrs on the 0-320 along with a new filter. We used an engine oil analysis to set oil changes and keep check on eng. cond. What this boiles down to, is, the more you fly, the cheeper it is. As you can see from the above info, the 172 was cheeper to fly than the 150's, just in engine times.
User avatar
Jody Wittmeyer
Posts: 591
Joined: Wed Nov 17, 2004 13:47
Location: Kewanee, IL. (EZI)
Contact:

Post by Jody Wittmeyer »

Let's see....12 years gives me about 2400 hours. We'll see what happens.
Blue Skies and Stay Safe, and preserve 'em
mike newall
Posts: 247
Joined: Thu Nov 18, 2004 06:32
Location: UK
Contact:

Post by mike newall »

If it starts - go fly...... easy :D
User avatar
joea
Site Admin
Posts: 5993
Joined: Thu Nov 11, 2004 13:01
Location: Phoenix Arizona
Contact:

Post by joea »

Mike,

This is our heartburn. Good engines, excellent compression and not making metal as well as fewer hours than the TBO and now Continental is saying that they need to be overhauled!!??

Glad that I am not a commercial operator who has to follow the service bulletins and am going to fly mine until it reaches TBO or has a problem inside!

Joe A
Post Reply