STC for starter and battery ?

Post-War Aeronca Champ airplanes
Post Reply
rudymantel
Posts: 36
Joined: Mon Jan 22, 2007 09:01
Location: Hollywood North Perry (FL) HWO
Contact:

STC for starter and battery ?

Post by rudymantel »

Guys,
What STC is available for installing a small battery and light weight starter on an 85 hp Champ? (C-85-12 engine)

I'm considering buying a Champ with a light weight starter and a small battery- possibly an "informal" installation (I haven't yet checked the records). If necessary, is there a way to "formalize" this installation?
Thanks,
Rudy
mike newall
Posts: 247
Joined: Thu Nov 18, 2004 06:32
Location: UK
Contact:

Post by mike newall »

Yep, take it off and fly it like it was designed :D
rudymantel
Posts: 36
Joined: Mon Jan 22, 2007 09:01
Location: Hollywood North Perry (FL) HWO
Contact:

STC for starter and battery ?

Post by rudymantel »

Mike, that's witty but not helpful-
Rudy
User avatar
joea
Site Admin
Posts: 5993
Joined: Thu Nov 11, 2004 13:01
Location: Phoenix Arizona
Contact:

Post by joea »

Rudy,

STC information for the starter was posted on the other thread.

http://www.joea.com/phpBB2/viewtopic.ph ... 7&start=15

No STC for the wiring and battery, thats done using a service letter or 337 field approval.
rudymantel
Posts: 36
Joined: Mon Jan 22, 2007 09:01
Location: Hollywood North Perry (FL) HWO
Contact:

Post by rudymantel »

Joe, the starter is not in question. The airplane I'm interested in has a light weight starter on a -12 engine. There's an STC for that.
It's the battery installation I need documentation on. An approved 337
would be most helpful.
Rudy
User avatar
joea
Site Admin
Posts: 5993
Joined: Thu Nov 11, 2004 13:01
Location: Phoenix Arizona
Contact:

Post by joea »

Rudy,

Are you sure that the plane you are looking at does not already have a 337 done on the work in question?

Its not that big of a deal. The A&P who installed it can fill it out and send it to the local FSDO.

If the work was not done by an A&P (or approved technician) then it needs to be inspected very carefully and make sure its done right, as well as legally, then a 337 done by a certified mechanic and sent to the FAA.
rudymantel
Posts: 36
Joined: Mon Jan 22, 2007 09:01
Location: Hollywood North Perry (FL) HWO
Contact:

Post by rudymantel »

Joe, I'm not sure it's that easy. Today most feds are reluctant to approve an installation from scratch (field approval). Having a previously-approved 337 really helps.
Rudy
User avatar
joea
Site Admin
Posts: 5993
Joined: Thu Nov 11, 2004 13:01
Location: Phoenix Arizona
Contact:

Post by joea »

Rudy,

It is here in Arizona. Do the form, take it to the FSDO and get it approved.

Right now I do not have a copy of anyone's plane that has had the mod done on it, but I know of several.

If I hear of anyone who has had it done who I am in touch with will let you know. The last guy who did this is now up in Alaska, so a bit out of touch.
rudymantel
Posts: 36
Joined: Mon Jan 22, 2007 09:01
Location: Hollywood North Perry (FL) HWO
Contact:

Post by rudymantel »

Thanks Joe-
Rudy
mike newall
Posts: 247
Joined: Thu Nov 18, 2004 06:32
Location: UK
Contact:

Post by mike newall »

On a more serious note - try get approval for the newer lightweight batteries like the Hawker or Odyssey - they are half the weight of the standard boat anchors.

In the UK, our Champs are on the equivalent of an Experimental ticket so stuff like this is easy. I would put a Yuasa 17Ah sealed battery in and a flyweight starter. The Yuasa is an awesome battery - small and powerful enough to give at least 4 or 5 start attempts on an 200h.p. IO-360 in a Christen Eagle I had.

Still think you should junk the weight and enjoy lightweight 85 h.p. Champ flying - it doesn't get much better :D
User avatar
joea
Site Admin
Posts: 5993
Joined: Thu Nov 11, 2004 13:01
Location: Phoenix Arizona
Contact:

Post by joea »

Mike,

Totally agree and the newer lightweight batteries are also sealed, so you do not have to have an enclosure or drain for the battery.
rudymantel
Posts: 36
Joined: Mon Jan 22, 2007 09:01
Location: Hollywood North Perry (FL) HWO
Contact:

Post by rudymantel »

Mike, I agree. For 8 yars I owned an S-1S Pitts with an IO-360 and no electrical system whatsoever. (A little gel-cel for the radio) A wobble pump gave initial fuel pressure. But I had a lineman trained to prop it. I just don't like propping an airplane all by myself with no one in the cockpit. Hence, I need an electric starter.
Rudy
User avatar
joea
Site Admin
Posts: 5993
Joined: Thu Nov 11, 2004 13:01
Location: Phoenix Arizona
Contact:

Post by joea »

Rudy,

As well its getting worse and worse in the general aviation sector. There have been a few accidents where someone hand propped their plane while alone and it got away from them.

Its only a matter of time before its required to have some sort of starter on the plane, or two people at the plane when starting.

Doing what you and many others (myself included) are doing right now is just getting a head start.

Joe
big chief 48
Posts: 125
Joined: Thu Nov 09, 2006 23:57
Location: Duluth MN.
Contact:

batt and starter

Post by big chief 48 »

Hi guys. Light is the best way to go, but I just put the chief on floats for the first time, and a lightweight stater will come in handy after I've missed a few docks and have to climb out on a wet, bobbing float to hand prop a hot engine. I have come up with an ingenious way of doing this without adding gross weight... I was 215 lbs. I just got under 200 and when I get to 185lbs, I will live large, by buying myself that new starter. :D :D :D
User avatar
joea
Site Admin
Posts: 5993
Joined: Thu Nov 11, 2004 13:01
Location: Phoenix Arizona
Contact:

Post by joea »

Rudy,

Look at the most recent post on the thread below. The last poster got a field approval for the battery/starter setup, so if you need a copy you could contact him directly using the "email" button on the thread.

http://www.joea.com/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?t=1634
Post Reply