New vs. Old Rib Weight's

A section to provide help and assistance to anyone restoring their airplane.
User avatar
Nathan K. Hammond
Posts: 2371
Joined: Wed Nov 17, 2004 00:22
Location: Danville, KY (DVK)
Contact:

New vs. Old Rib Weight's

Post by Nathan K. Hammond »

We always hear New ribs are heavier than old rib; so I finally got around to weighing them.

Item.....Old weight......New weight.....

Root Rib... 1lb 4.65oz.... 13.95oz...
Main rib... 6.95oz.... 11.30oz...
Aileron Rib... 6.70oz.... 8.15oz...
Tip Rib... 7.85oz.... 9.40oz...

Leading Edge (old 7 piece vs. new 2 piece) 7lbs 5.85oz... 6lbs 4.70oz.

SO.... that all comes to 16lbs 7.75oz for old stock and 18lbs 10.25oz. for new stuff.

That's 4lbs 5oz difference for two wings.

nkh
7AC-5691
Super 85-12F @ DVK
User avatar
DELCOM
Posts: 280
Joined: Fri Sep 23, 2005 14:05
Location: Columbia, California
Contact:

Re: New vs. Old Rib Weight's

Post by DELCOM »

Nate

How is the restoration coming along? Any idea yet when it will fly again.

Good info.........every pound seems to count.

Del
N84029 7AC conv. #2716 Completed and flying
N83059 7BCM #1715 fully restored and sold
MikeB
Posts: 3246
Joined: Wed Nov 17, 2004 17:07
Location: Western Wisconsin
Contact:

Re: New vs. Old Rib Weight's

Post by MikeB »

I don't know what the original weight was on the L16's but I don't believe they had any interior panels at all (looking at some old drawings in manuals).
Mike
kyleb
Posts: 285
Joined: Wed Jun 04, 2008 19:13
Location: Marietta, GA
Contact:

Re: New vs. Old Rib Weight's

Post by kyleb »

Another interesting comparison:

Brand new Champ, Circa 1946: $2,750.

One set of brand new Champ wing ribs, Circa 2012: $3,000.
Kyle Boatright
Marietta, GA

RV-6 Built and Flying
Champ Restoration Underway
Paul Agaliotis
Posts: 2589
Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2004 18:49
Location: San Martin, California
Contact:

Re: New vs. Old Rib Weight's

Post by Paul Agaliotis »

Mike,
I believe they were installed with a T.O. Even the AAF got tire of patching holes from the pilots boots and belts. I have all of my cabin supports and panels stripped. I plan to put some clear over the brushed aluminum unless I get my mind changed.
The new ribs are quite a bit thicker than the originals. I think they were .016 and the replacements are .032, twice as thick,twice the weight.
Paul
Mailing Adress : Paul Agaliotis 2060 E. San Martin, San Martin,Calif. 95046
MikeB
Posts: 3246
Joined: Wed Nov 17, 2004 17:07
Location: Western Wisconsin
Contact:

Re: New vs. Old Rib Weight's

Post by MikeB »

Paul,
I believe the difference in rib thickness is .020 (old style with PK screws) and new .032 for pop rivets. It seems the old leading edge was .016 and the new WA is .022 (or about that). Either way it adds weight. Now add the WA 5 gallon wing tanks and that's another 18#.....as us old Norwegiens say "Uff Da" :roll: . Mine actually came in at about 950# but that includes the 0200 engine, mufflers, 25 amp battery, Skytec starting system, 4 new heavy struts, WA wing rebuild with WA tanks, green house (instead of fabric overhead) interior, etc. The 0200 conversion seems to handle the extra weight quite well, though. Best of all I don't have to swing the prop to start it but it's a good thing I'm a 'light weight'.


Mike
User avatar
David Johnson
Posts: 584
Joined: Sat Nov 20, 2004 08:28
Location: Jasper, Georgia
Contact:

Re: New vs. Old Rib Weight's

Post by David Johnson »

Don't forget, original ribs had no protective coating. Most of us prime them with something now. Epoxy ain't light, but I still like using it. David J.
MikeB
Posts: 3246
Joined: Wed Nov 17, 2004 17:07
Location: Western Wisconsin
Contact:

Re: New vs. Old Rib Weight's

Post by MikeB »

David,
No doubt painting the ribs with epoxy might be a good idea but I've always wondered about it as I don't believe I've ever seen corroded ribs. Might be because I'm in a dryer part of the country, though. Seems like what corrosion I've found has been on the trailing edge of the wing under the fabric.

Just wondering.........

Mike
User avatar
David Johnson
Posts: 584
Joined: Sat Nov 20, 2004 08:28
Location: Jasper, Georgia
Contact:

Re: New vs. Old Rib Weight's

Post by David Johnson »

Mike, around here, you can leave a new rib uncovered in the hangar, and in just a few days see surface corrosion starting. I would hate to try that in Florida. Humidity Baby! David J.
User avatar
Nathan K. Hammond
Posts: 2371
Joined: Wed Nov 17, 2004 00:22
Location: Danville, KY (DVK)
Contact:

Re: New vs. Old Rib Weight's

Post by Nathan K. Hammond »

David Johnson wrote:Don't forget, original ribs had no protective coating. Most of us prime them with something now. Epoxy ain't light, but I still like using it. David J.
Actually, when I weighed this stuff; the old ribs where bare and the new ribs/LE were etched/alodined/epoxy primed.

What I was amazed to see, the weight gain was only 2 pounds per wing. I can save that by removing the shag carpet and valour side panels.

Go figure.

nkh
7AC-5691
Super 85-12F @ DVK
User avatar
David Johnson
Posts: 584
Joined: Sat Nov 20, 2004 08:28
Location: Jasper, Georgia
Contact:

Re: New vs. Old Rib Weight's

Post by David Johnson »

Only fly after a bathroom visit...

Or fly without underwear...

Only fly with flip flops...

OR FLY NAKED!
User avatar
Nathan K. Hammond
Posts: 2371
Joined: Wed Nov 17, 2004 00:22
Location: Danville, KY (DVK)
Contact:

Re: New vs. Old Rib Weight's

Post by Nathan K. Hammond »

Del, it's coming along. One wing finished and working on the other. I've got all the fittings, as well as, the tail feathers in the shop blasting them. Takes me about 3 hours to clean off an elevator. With only 3-4 hours to work a day, it's taking forever to get everything blasted so I can prime it all.

Hows your new project?

nkh
7AC-5691
Super 85-12F @ DVK
User avatar
Nathan K. Hammond
Posts: 2371
Joined: Wed Nov 17, 2004 00:22
Location: Danville, KY (DVK)
Contact:

Re: New vs. Old Rib Weight's

Post by Nathan K. Hammond »

Just take it out and play with it.... Err fly it. :lol:

nkh
7AC-5691
Super 85-12F @ DVK
kyleb
Posts: 285
Joined: Wed Jun 04, 2008 19:13
Location: Marietta, GA
Contact:

Re: New vs. Old Rib Weight's

Post by kyleb »

Nathan K. Hammond wrote: Takes me about 3 hours to clean off an elevator.

nkh
I figured you'd get through one in 30 minutes with your new bead blaster. If it takes 3 hours, is that really faster than stripping the parts (which is a slow, awful process itself)..
Kyle Boatright
Marietta, GA

RV-6 Built and Flying
Champ Restoration Underway
User avatar
Nathan K. Hammond
Posts: 2371
Joined: Wed Nov 17, 2004 00:22
Location: Danville, KY (DVK)
Contact:

Re: New vs. Old Rib Weight's

Post by Nathan K. Hammond »

Kyle, it's taken some trial and error to make the blaster work at its best. First I had issues with the pickup tube, then sealing it up so glass didn't blow out the seams. Now that I've got that all fixed, the compressor is running non stop and making water. I I need to get a water trap and may build an inter-cooler to help dry out the air.

Its taking less time now, did an elevator in about 45 minutes. It's definitely better than stripping in my opinion.

nkh
7AC-5691
Super 85-12F @ DVK
Post Reply